Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs WAFMX
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5
Price$95.83
Change-$0.11 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.57
Change-$0.02 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.81M
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. WAFMX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Hold and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. WAFMX (31.8M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWFX (0.95) vs WAFMX (0.70). RNWFX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWFX (24 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWFX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.27 vs. WAFMX (1.87). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.92 vs. WAFMX (3.53).
| RNWFX | WAFMX | RNWFX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.20 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.036 | 3.478 | 691% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.1B | 31.8M | 233,019% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.70 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.27 | 1.87 | 1,030% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.30 | 45.59 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.92 | 3.53 | 593% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.09 | 30.34 | 300% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement