Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs WAFMX
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5
Price$86.46
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.63B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.82
Change+$0.03 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.62M
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. WAFMX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Buy and WAFMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. WAFMX (37.6M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWFX (1.09) vs WAFMX (0.70). RNWFX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWFX (23 years) vs WAFMX (13 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (29.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWFX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). WAFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.52 vs. RNWFX (7.83). WAFMX return over 5 years is better than : 42.03 vs. RNWFX (30.81).
| RNWFX | WAFMX | RNWFX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.20 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.908 | 10.725 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.6B | 37.6M | 179,787% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.70 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.83 | 14.52 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.90 | 32.23 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.81 | 42.03 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.49 | 30.55 | 208% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers