Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs WAFMX
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5
Price$90.05
Change-$0.22 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.59B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.71M
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. WAFMX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. WAFMX (35.7M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWFX (1.04) vs WAFMX (0.71). RNWFX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWFX (23 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWFX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.50 vs. WAFMX (9.54). WAFMX (27.05) and RNWFX (25.86) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RNWFX | WAFMX | RNWFX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.20 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.554 | 8.116 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.6B | 35.7M | 197,759% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.71 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.50 | 9.54 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.39 | 31.83 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.86 | 27.05 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.31 | 28.34 | 269% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement