Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs WAFMX
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs WAFMX
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. WAFMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Hold and WAFMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. WAFMX (23.9M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWFX (1.20) vs WAFMX (0.00). RNWFX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWFX (24 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). WAFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWFX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.39 vs. WAFMX (4.09). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.98 vs. WAFMX (-7.46).
| RNWFX | WAFMX | RNWFX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.794 | 6.111 | 308% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 23.9M | 380,335% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.39 | 4.09 | 768% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.06 | 35.01 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.98 | -7.46 | -281% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.60 | 50.28 | 270% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement