Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs WBELX
RNWFX vs WBELX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs WBELX
RNWFX vs WBELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. WBELX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a StrongBuy and WBELX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. WBELX (96.9M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than WBELX: RNWFX (1.22) vs WBELX (0.80). RNWFX was incepted earlier than WBELX: RNWFX (24 years) vs WBELX (18 years). WBELX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). WBELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBELX: RNWFX (250) vs WBELX (500000). WBELX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.38 vs. RNWFX (22.59). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.78 vs. WBELX (9.95).
| RNWFX | WBELX | RNWFX / WBELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.99 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.27 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.094 | 15.013 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 96.9M | 91,434% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 0.80 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.59 | 27.38 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.61 | 62.61 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.78 | 9.95 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.30 | 65.38 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement