Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs WBELX
RNWFX vs WBELX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs WBELX
RNWFX vs WBELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. WBELX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Hold and WBELX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. WBELX (107M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than WBELX: RNWFX (1.20) vs WBELX (0.76). RNWFX was incepted earlier than WBELX: RNWFX (24 years) vs WBELX (18 years). WBELX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). WBELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBELX: RNWFX (250) vs WBELX (500000). WBELX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.75 vs. RNWFX (31.39). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.98 vs. WBELX (4.70).
| RNWFX | WBELX | RNWFX / WBELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.99 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.27 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.794 | 20.104 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 107M | 84,953% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.76 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.39 | 40.75 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.06 | 63.54 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.98 | 4.70 | 446% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.60 | 89.88 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement