Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs ZEMAX
RNWFX vs ZEMAX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs ZEMAX
RNWFX vs ZEMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. ZEMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Hold and ZEMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. ZEMAX (350M). ZEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: ZEMAX (1.40) vs RNWFX (1.20). RNWFX was incepted earlier than ZEMAX: RNWFX (24 years) vs ZEMAX (8 years). ZEMAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). ZEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZEMAX: RNWFX (250) vs ZEMAX (100000). ZEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.06 vs. RNWFX (26.93). ZEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.65 vs. RNWFX (16.36).
| RNWFX | ZEMAX | RNWFX / ZEMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.93 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.213 | 27.718 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 350M | 25,971% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.40 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.93 | 36.06 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.29 | 81.84 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.36 | 25.65 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers