Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs ZEMIX
RNWFX vs ZEMIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs ZEMIX
RNWFX vs ZEMIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. ZEMIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Hold and ZEMIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. ZEMIX (350M). ZEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: ZEMIX (1.46) vs RNWFX (1.20). RNWFX was incepted earlier than ZEMIX: RNWFX (24 years) vs ZEMIX (8 years). ZEMIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). ZEMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZEMIX: RNWFX (250) vs ZEMIX (250000). ZEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.17 vs. RNWFX (31.39). ZEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 31.66 vs. RNWFX (20.98).
| RNWFX | ZEMIX | RNWFX / ZEMIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.86 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.12 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.794 | 33.548 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 350M | 25,971% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.46 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.39 | 41.17 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.06 | 89.17 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.98 | 31.66 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement