Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs RREMX
RNWHX vs RREMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs RREMX
RNWHX vs RREMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. RREMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and RREMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. RREMX (6.76B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than RREMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs RREMX (1.06). RNWHX was incepted earlier than RREMX: RNWHX (11 years) vs RREMX (10 years). RREMX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RREMX (16.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RREMX: RNWHX (250) vs RREMX (250000). RREMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.16 vs. RNWHX (31.15). RREMX return over 5 years is better than : 56.45 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| RNWHX | RREMX | RNWHX / RREMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.88 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.89 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.743 | 27.172 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 6.76B | 1,345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.06 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.15 | 50.16 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.37 | 83.54 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.21 | 56.45 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement