Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs RREMX
RNWHX vs RREMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs RREMX
RNWHX vs RREMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. RREMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and RREMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. RREMX (6.42B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than RREMX: RNWHX (1.14) vs RREMX (1.06). RNWHX was incepted earlier than RREMX: RNWHX (11 years) vs RREMX (10 years). RREMX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RREMX (20.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RREMX: RNWHX (250) vs RREMX (250000). RREMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.71 vs. RNWHX (19.47). RREMX return over 5 years is better than : 51.04 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| RNWHX | RREMX | RNWHX / RREMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.88 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.89 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.651 | 21.866 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 6.42B | 1,413% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.06 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.47 | 38.71 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.67 | 69.04 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.04 | 51.04 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement