Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs RWCIX
RNWHX vs RWCIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs RWCIX
RNWHX vs RWCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. RWCIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and RWCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. RWCIX (228M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than RWCIX: RNWHX (1.15) vs RWCIX (0.72). RNWHX was incepted earlier than RWCIX: RNWHX (11 years) vs RWCIX (9 years). RWCIX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWCIX: RNWHX (250) vs RWCIX (250000). RWCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.80 vs. RNWHX (31.15). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.21 vs. RWCIX (-4.73).
| RNWHX | RWCIX | RNWHX / RWCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.24 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.24 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.743 | 10.512 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 228M | 39,868% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.72 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.15 | 37.80 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.37 | 56.17 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.21 | -4.73 | -427% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement