Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SBEMX
RNWHX vs SBEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SBEMX
RNWHX vs SBEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SBEMX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and SBEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SBEMX (106M). SBEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SBEMX (2.21) vs RNWHX (1.15). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SBEMX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SBEMX (15 years). SBEMX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SBEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBEMX: RNWHX (250) vs SBEMX (250000). SBEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.22 vs. RNWHX (23.68). SBEMX return over 5 years is better than : 75.97 vs. RNWHX (15.35).
| RNWHX | SBEMX | RNWHX / SBEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.99 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.68 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.152 | 25.064 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 106M | 85,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 2.21 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | 48.22 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.71 | 108.62 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.35 | 75.97 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.91 | 211.32 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers