Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SBEMX
RNWHX vs SBEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SBEMX
RNWHX vs SBEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SBEMX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and SBEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. SBEMX (109M). SBEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SBEMX (2.34) vs RNWHX (1.17). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SBEMX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SBEMX (15 years). SBEMX (1.53) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SBEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBEMX: RNWHX (250) vs SBEMX (250000). SBEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.23 vs. RNWHX (19.43). SBEMX return over 5 years is better than : 92.67 vs. RNWHX (21.08).
| RNWHX | SBEMX | RNWHX / SBEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.84 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.53 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.229 | 24.132 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 109M | 81,284% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 2.34 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.43 | 39.23 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.47 | 111.71 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.08 | 92.67 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.99 | 169.81 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers