Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SBHEX
RNWHX vs SBHEX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SBHEX
RNWHX vs SBHEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SBHEX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and SBHEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. SBHEX (99.7M). SBHEX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SBHEX (2.09) vs RNWHX (1.14). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SBHEX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SBHEX (12 years). SBHEX (1.95) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SBHEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHEX: RNWHX (250) vs SBHEX (2500). SBHEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.90 vs. RNWHX (16.71). SBHEX return over 5 years is better than : 73.63 vs. RNWHX (14.96).
| RNWHX | SBHEX | RNWHX / SBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.99 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.95 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.487 | 17.007 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 99.7M | 90,973% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 2.09 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.71 | 31.90 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.26 | 85.76 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.96 | 73.63 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.20 | 160.93 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement