Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SEKAX
RNWHX vs SEKAX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SEKAX
RNWHX vs SEKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SEKAX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and SEKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. SEKAX (73.5M). SEKAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SEKAX (2.08) vs RNWHX (1.14). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SEKAX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SEKAX (25 years). SEKAX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SEKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEKAX: RNWHX (250) vs SEKAX (1000). SEKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.89 vs. RNWHX (16.71). SEKAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.84 vs. RNWHX (14.96).
| RNWHX | SEKAX | RNWHX / SEKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.72 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.487 | 20.221 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 73.5M | 123,401% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 2.08 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.71 | 33.89 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.26 | 64.10 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.96 | 27.84 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.20 | 107.23 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement