Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SEKAX
RNWHX vs SEKAX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SEKAX
RNWHX vs SEKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SEKAX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and SEKAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SEKAX (78.3M). SEKAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SEKAX (2.14) vs RNWHX (1.15). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SEKAX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SEKAX (25 years). SEKAX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SEKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEKAX: RNWHX (250) vs SEKAX (1000). SEKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.40 vs. RNWHX (28.64). SEKAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.34 vs. RNWHX (19.90).
| RNWHX | SEKAX | RNWHX / SEKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.72 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.296 | 27.550 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 78.3M | 116,092% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 2.14 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.64 | 50.40 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.63 | 77.16 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.90 | 25.34 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.75 | 140.74 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers