Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SEKAX
RNWHX vs SEKAX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SEKAX
RNWHX vs SEKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SEKAX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and SEKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SEKAX (78.7M). SEKAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SEKAX (2.08) vs RNWHX (1.14). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SEKAX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SEKAX (25 years). SEKAX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SEKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEKAX: RNWHX (250) vs SEKAX (1000). SEKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.35 vs. RNWHX (20.31). SEKAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.13 vs. RNWHX (14.31).
| RNWHX | SEKAX | RNWHX / SEKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.72 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.641 | 28.079 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 78.7M | 115,502% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 2.08 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.31 | 46.35 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.80 | 81.29 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.31 | 27.13 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.40 | 130.70 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement