Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SEKCX
RNWHX vs SEKCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SEKCX
RNWHX vs SEKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SEKCX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and SEKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. SEKCX (73.6M). SEKCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SEKCX (1.25) vs RNWHX (1.14). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SEKCX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SEKCX (25 years). SEKCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SEKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEKCX: RNWHX (250) vs SEKCX (1000). SEKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.21 vs. RNWHX (17.42). SEKCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.68 vs. RNWHX (13.54).
| RNWHX | SEKCX | RNWHX / SEKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.90 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.43 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.182 | 19.762 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 73.6M | 123,234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.25 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.42 | 35.21 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.10 | 65.29 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.54 | 18.68 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.14 | 92.76 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers