Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SEKCX
RNWHX vs SEKCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SEKCX
RNWHX vs SEKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SEKCX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and SEKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. SEKCX (76.8M). SEKCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SEKCX (1.37) vs RNWHX (1.17). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SEKCX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SEKCX (25 years). SEKCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SEKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEKCX: RNWHX (250) vs SEKCX (1000). SEKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.01 vs. RNWHX (20.30). SEKCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.16 vs. RNWHX (18.55).
| RNWHX | SEKCX | RNWHX / SEKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.90 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.43 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.349 | 25.571 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 76.8M | 115,365% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.37 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.30 | 39.01 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.97 | 79.15 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.55 | 28.16 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.30 | 91.75 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement