Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SEKIX
RNWHX vs SEKIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SEKIX
RNWHX vs SEKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SEKIX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and SEKIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. SEKIX (75.5M). SEKIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SEKIX (2.17) vs RNWHX (1.14). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SEKIX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SEKIX (18 years). SEKIX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SEKIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEKIX: RNWHX (250) vs SEKIX (1000000). SEKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.36 vs. RNWHX (15.58). SEKIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.14 vs. RNWHX (12.84).
| RNWHX | SEKIX | RNWHX / SEKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.90 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.35 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.921 | 23.670 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 75.5M | 120,132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 2.17 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.58 | 37.36 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.80 | 72.28 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.84 | 29.14 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.12 | 118.72 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement