Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SEKRX
RNWHX vs SEKRX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SEKRX
RNWHX vs SEKRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SEKRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and SEKRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SEKRX (84.5M). SEKRX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SEKRX (2.61) vs RNWHX (1.15). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SEKRX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SEKRX (8 years). SEKRX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SEKRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). SEKRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: SEKRX (0) vs RNWHX (250). SEKRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.72 vs. RNWHX (31.15). SEKRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.51 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| RNWHX | SEKRX | RNWHX / SEKRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.90 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.29 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.743 | 36.177 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 84.5M | 107,574% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 2.61 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.15 | 61.72 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.37 | 97.46 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.21 | 36.51 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement