Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SEMGX
RNWHX vs SEMGX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SEMGX
RNWHX vs SEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SEMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and SEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SEMGX (84.5M). SEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SEMGX (2.32) vs RNWHX (1.15). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SEMGX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SEMGX (30 years). SEMGX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEMGX: RNWHX (250) vs SEMGX (2500). SEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.54 vs. RNWHX (31.15). SEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.92 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| RNWHX | SEMGX | RNWHX / SEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.98 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.47 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.743 | 36.110 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 84.5M | 107,574% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 2.32 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.15 | 61.54 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.37 | 97.04 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.21 | 35.92 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.48 | 161.60 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement