Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SEQFX
RNWHX vs SEQFX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SEQFX
RNWHX vs SEQFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SEQFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and SEQFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. SEQFX (1.71B). SEQFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SEQFX (3.11) vs RNWHX (1.14). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SEQFX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SEQFX (12 years). SEQFX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SEQFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEQFX: RNWHX (250) vs SEQFX (100000). SEQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.01 vs. RNWHX (19.47). SEQFX return over 5 years is better than : 29.67 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| RNWHX | SEQFX | RNWHX / SEQFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.96 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.17 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.651 | 23.175 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 1.71B | 5,304% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 3.11 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.47 | 41.01 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.67 | 73.22 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.04 | 29.67 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.31 | 115.28 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers