Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SFGIX
RNWHX vs SFGIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SFGIX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.56
Change+$0.54 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.12B
Seafarer Overseas Gr and Income Investor
Price$13.58
Change+$0.15 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.14B
RNWHX vs SFGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SFGIX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and SFGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. SFGIX (3.14B). SFGIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SFGIX (2.50) vs RNWHX (0.99). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SFGIX: RNWHX (10 years) vs SFGIX (13 years). SFGIX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFGIX (5.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGIX: RNWHX (250) vs SFGIX (2500). SFGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.38 vs. RNWHX (11.66). RNWHX (32.51) and SFGIX (31.59) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RNWHX | SFGIX | RNWHX / SFGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.96 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.96 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.496 | 17.653 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.1B | 3.14B | 2,230% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 2.50 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.66 | 13.38 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.00 | 26.40 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.51 | 31.59 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement