Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SFGIX
RNWHX vs SFGIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SFGIX
RNWHX vs SFGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SFGIX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a StrongBuy and SFGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. SFGIX (3.64B). SFGIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SFGIX (4.72) vs RNWHX (1.17). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SFGIX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SFGIX (15 years). SFGIX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SFGIX (18.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGIX: RNWHX (250) vs SFGIX (2500). SFGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.10 vs. RNWHX (20.22). SFGIX return over 5 years is better than : 32.27 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| RNWHX | SFGIX | RNWHX / SFGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.97 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.97 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.480 | 20.667 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 3.64B | 2,433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 4.72 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.22 | 32.10 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.08 | 58.79 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.21 | 32.27 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.14 | 84.06 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement