Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SFGIX
RNWHX vs SFGIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SFGIX
RNWHX vs SFGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SFGIX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and SFGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SFGIX (3.88B). SFGIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SFGIX (2.53) vs RNWHX (1.15). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SFGIX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SFGIX (14 years). SFGIX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SFGIX (16.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGIX: RNWHX (250) vs SFGIX (2500). SFGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.48 vs. RNWHX (28.13). SFGIX return over 5 years is better than : 26.86 vs. RNWHX (19.74).
| RNWHX | SFGIX | RNWHX / SFGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.97 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.97 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.774 | 19.986 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 3.88B | 2,343% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 2.53 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.13 | 39.48 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.96 | 54.69 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.74 | 26.86 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.74 | 98.26 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement