Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SFVLX
RNWHX vs SFVLX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SFVLX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$95.66
Change+$0.25 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.42B
Seafarer Overseas Value Investor
Price$16.90
Change+$0.10 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.67M
RNWHX vs SFVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SFVLX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and SFVLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.4B vs. SFVLX (129M). SFVLX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SFVLX (2.96) vs RNWHX (0.93). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SFVLX: RNWHX (10 years) vs SFVLX (9 years). SFVLX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFVLX (11.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFVLX: RNWHX (250) vs SFVLX (2500). SFVLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.13 vs. RNWHX (17.36). SFVLX return over 5 years is better than : 79.74 vs. RNWHX (30.06).
| RNWHX | SFVLX | RNWHX / SFVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.19 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.835 | 30.906 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.4B | 129M | 58,450% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 2.96 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.36 | 24.13 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.90 | 59.82 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.06 | 79.74 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers