Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SFVLX
RNWHX vs SFVLX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SFVLX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$89.85
Change-$0.04 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
Seafarer Overseas Value Investor
Price$16.59
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.1M
RNWHX vs SFVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SFVLX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and SFVLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. SFVLX (119M). SFVLX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SFVLX (3.14) vs RNWHX (1.00). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SFVLX: RNWHX (10 years) vs SFVLX (9 years). SFVLX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFVLX (11.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFVLX: RNWHX (250) vs SFVLX (2500). SFVLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.49 vs. RNWHX (11.99). SFVLX return over 5 years is better than : 79.68 vs. RNWHX (22.32).
| RNWHX | SFVLX | RNWHX / SFVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.17 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.193 | 28.660 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.8B | 119M | 60,336% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 3.14 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.99 | 23.49 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.51 | 42.34 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.32 | 79.68 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers