Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SFVLX
RNWHX vs SFVLX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SFVLX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.34
Change+$0.10 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.31B
Seafarer Overseas Value Investor
Price$15.95
Change+$0.03 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.93M
RNWHX vs SFVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SFVLX commentary
Jul 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and SFVLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.3B vs. SFVLX (114M). SFVLX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SFVLX (3.22) vs RNWHX (0.99). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SFVLX: RNWHX (10 years) vs SFVLX (9 years). SFVLX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFVLX (3.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFVLX: RNWHX (250) vs SFVLX (2500). SFVLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.51 vs. RNWHX (10.75). SFVLX return over 5 years is better than : 81.91 vs. RNWHX (28.65).
| RNWHX | SFVLX | RNWHX / SFVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.17 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.206 | 23.315 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.3B | 114M | 61,667% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 3.22 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.75 | 20.51 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.21 | 39.73 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.65 | 81.91 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement