Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SFVLX
RNWHX vs SFVLX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SFVLX
RNWHX vs SFVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SFVLX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and SFVLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. SFVLX (154M). SFVLX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SFVLX (3.26) vs RNWHX (1.14). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SFVLX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SFVLX (10 years). SFVLX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SFVLX (11.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFVLX: RNWHX (250) vs SFVLX (2500). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.47 vs. SFVLX (16.88). SFVLX return over 5 years is better than : 53.66 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| RNWHX | SFVLX | RNWHX / SFVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.19 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.651 | 6.213 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 154M | 58,896% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 3.26 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.47 | 16.88 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.67 | 41.00 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.04 | 53.66 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.31 | 128.28 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement