Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SFVLX
RNWHX vs SFVLX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SFVLX
RNWHX vs SFVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SFVLX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and SFVLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SFVLX (160M). SFVLX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SFVLX (3.14) vs RNWHX (1.15). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SFVLX: RNWHX (11 years) vs SFVLX (10 years). SFVLX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SFVLX (11.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFVLX: RNWHX (250) vs SFVLX (2500). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.15 vs. SFVLX (25.32). SFVLX return over 5 years is better than : 53.70 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| RNWHX | SFVLX | RNWHX / SFVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.19 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.743 | 7.574 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 160M | 56,813% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 3.14 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.15 | 25.32 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.37 | 47.20 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.21 | 53.70 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.48 | 141.85 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement