Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs TCEMX
RNWHX vs TCEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs TCEMX
RNWHX vs TCEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. TCEMX commentary
Aug 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and TCEMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. TCEMX (316M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than TCEMX: RNWHX (1.17) vs TCEMX (0.44). RNWHX was incepted earlier than TCEMX: RNWHX (11 years) vs TCEMX (20 years). TCEMX (2.76) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. TCEMX (16.75). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs TCEMX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.61 vs. TCEMX (11.86). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 17.09 vs. TCEMX (0.14).
| RNWHX | TCEMX | RNWHX / TCEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.51 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.76 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.490 | 9.699 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 316M | 28,703% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.44 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.61 | 11.86 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.22 | 34.12 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.09 | 0.14 | 12,359% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.72 | 39.43 | 276% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers