Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs TCEMX
RNWHX vs TCEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs TCEMX
RNWHX vs TCEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. TCEMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and TCEMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. TCEMX (330M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than TCEMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs TCEMX (0.43). RNWHX was incepted earlier than TCEMX: RNWHX (11 years) vs TCEMX (20 years). TCEMX (2.76) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. TCEMX (16.75). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs TCEMX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.15 vs. TCEMX (17.47). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.21 vs. TCEMX (6.07).
| RNWHX | TCEMX | RNWHX / TCEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.51 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.76 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.743 | 13.226 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 330M | 27,545% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.43 | 269% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.15 | 17.47 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.37 | 41.03 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.21 | 6.07 | 333% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.48 | 54.37 | 244% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers