Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs TEMRX
RNWHX vs TEMRX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs TEMRX
RNWHX vs TEMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. TEMRX commentary
Sep 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and TEMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. TEMRX (1.77B). TEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: TEMRX (2.70) vs RNWHX (1.15). RNWHX was incepted earlier than TEMRX: RNWHX (11 years) vs TEMRX (16 years). TEMRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). TEMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEMRX: RNWHX (250) vs TEMRX (2500). TEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.93 vs. RNWHX (16.62). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.87 vs. TEMRX (12.63).
| RNWHX | TEMRX | RNWHX / TEMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.28 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.28 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.633 | 17.174 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90B | 1.77B | 5,085% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 2.70 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.62 | 24.93 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.86 | 72.38 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.87 | 12.63 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.27 | 40.02 | 271% |