Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs TEMRX
RNWHX vs TEMRX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs TEMRX
RNWHX vs TEMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. TEMRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and TEMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. TEMRX (2.01B). TEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: TEMRX (2.59) vs RNWHX (1.15). RNWHX was incepted earlier than TEMRX: RNWHX (11 years) vs TEMRX (16 years). TEMRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). TEMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEMRX: RNWHX (250) vs TEMRX (2500). TEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.20 vs. RNWHX (31.15). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.21 vs. TEMRX (-0.43).
| RNWHX | TEMRX | RNWHX / TEMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.28 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.28 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.743 | 23.258 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 2.01B | 4,520% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 2.59 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.15 | 51.20 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.37 | 72.17 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.21 | -0.43 | -4,652% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.48 | 68.01 | 195% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement