Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs TEQKX
RNWHX vs TEQKX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs TEQKX
RNWHX vs TEQKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. TEQKX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and TEQKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. TEQKX (9.59B). TEQKX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: TEQKX (1.99) vs RNWHX (1.14). RNWHX was incepted earlier than TEQKX: RNWHX (11 years) vs TEQKX (16 years). RNWHX (0.72) is less costly to investors than TEQKX (0.51). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. TEQKX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEQKX: RNWHX (250) vs TEQKX (2500). TEQKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.08 vs. RNWHX (15.58). TEQKX return over 5 years is better than : 36.89 vs. RNWHX (12.84).
| RNWHX | TEQKX | RNWHX / TEQKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.51 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.51 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.921 | 19.129 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 9.59B | 946% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.99 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.58 | 33.08 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.80 | 68.36 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.84 | 36.89 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.12 | 116.61 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement