Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs TSRMX
RNWHX vs TSRMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs TSRMX
RNWHX vs TSRMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. TSRMX (2.4B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than TSRMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs TSRMX (0.82). RNWHX was incepted earlier than TSRMX: RNWHX (11 years) vs TSRMX (5 years). TSRMX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. TSRMX (21.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSRMX: RNWHX (250) vs TSRMX (50000). TSRMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.62 vs. RNWHX (27.71). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 19.35 vs. TSRMX (-5.90).
| RNWHX | TSRMX | RNWHX / TSRMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.01 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.05 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.393 | 20.455 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 2.4B | 3,794% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.82 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.71 | 30.62 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.46 | 48.90 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.35 | -5.90 | -328% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GMOD | 27.41 | -0.22 | -0.80% |
| GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | |||
| DISV | 41.95 | -0.50 | -1.18% |
| Dimensional International Sm Cp Val ETF | |||
| VFQY | 165.69 | -2.51 | -1.49% |
| Vanguard US Quality Factor ETF | |||
| LUNL | 11.43 | -0.68 | -5.62% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LUNR ETF | |||
| BABX | 17.50 | -1.17 | -6.27% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | |||