Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs UMEMX
RNWHX vs UMEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs UMEMX
RNWHX vs UMEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. UMEMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and UMEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. UMEMX (920M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than UMEMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs UMEMX (0.24). RNWHX was incepted earlier than UMEMX: RNWHX (11 years) vs UMEMX (28 years). UMEMX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). UMEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMEMX: RNWHX (250) vs UMEMX (2000). UMEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.45 vs. RNWHX (31.15). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.21 vs. UMEMX (18.34).
| RNWHX | UMEMX | RNWHX / UMEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.13 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.34 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.743 | 40.536 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 920M | 9,880% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.24 | 470% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.15 | 61.45 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.37 | 94.36 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.21 | 18.34 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.48 | 163.21 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement