Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs USEMX
RNWHX vs USEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs USEMX
RNWHX vs USEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. USEMX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and USEMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. USEMX (778M). USEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: USEMX (1.95) vs RNWHX (1.14). RNWHX was incepted earlier than USEMX: RNWHX (11 years) vs USEMX (32 years). USEMX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). USEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than USEMX: RNWHX (250) vs USEMX (3000). USEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.47 vs. RNWHX (20.29). USEMX return over 5 years is better than : 46.50 vs. RNWHX (16.12).
| RNWHX | USEMX | RNWHX / USEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.52 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.56 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.032 | 26.450 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 3000 | 8% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 778M | 11,684% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.95 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.29 | 38.47 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.36 | 80.59 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.12 | 46.50 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.35 | 137.51 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement