Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs USEMX
RNWHX vs USEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs USEMX
RNWHX vs USEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. USEMX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and USEMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. USEMX (789M). USEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: USEMX (1.95) vs RNWHX (1.15). RNWHX was incepted earlier than USEMX: RNWHX (11 years) vs USEMX (32 years). USEMX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). USEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than USEMX: RNWHX (250) vs USEMX (3000). USEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.42 vs. RNWHX (19.44). USEMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.99 vs. RNWHX (11.03).
| RNWHX | USEMX | RNWHX / USEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.52 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.56 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.877 | 26.529 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 3000 | 8% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 789M | 11,521% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.95 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.44 | 42.42 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.29 | 80.23 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.03 | 41.99 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.14 | 147.18 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers