Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WAEMX
RNWHX vs WAEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WAEMX
RNWHX vs WAEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WAEMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and WAEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. WAEMX (102M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WAEMX: RNWHX (1.14) vs WAEMX (0.00). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WAEMX: RNWHX (11 years) vs WAEMX (19 years). WAEMX (2.05) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. WAEMX (38.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAEMX: RNWHX (250) vs WAEMX (2000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.47 vs. WAEMX (-28.92). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 14.04 vs. WAEMX (-50.16).
| RNWHX | WAEMX | RNWHX / WAEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.95 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.05 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.651 | 20.000 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 102M | 88,922% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.47 | -28.92 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.67 | -28.17 | -155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.04 | -50.16 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.31 | -18.92 | -567% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement