Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WAEMX
RNWHX vs WAEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WAEMX
RNWHX vs WAEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WAEMX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and WAEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. WAEMX (108M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WAEMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs WAEMX (0.00). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WAEMX: RNWHX (11 years) vs WAEMX (19 years). WAEMX (2.05) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. WAEMX (38.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAEMX: RNWHX (250) vs WAEMX (2000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.50 vs. WAEMX (-21.77). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 19.26 vs. WAEMX (-45.27).
| RNWHX | WAEMX | RNWHX / WAEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.95 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.05 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.719 | 24.706 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.6B | 108M | 79,259% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.50 | -21.77 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.33 | -22.91 | -246% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.26 | -45.27 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.12 | -12.62 | -960% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement