Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WAESX
RNWHX vs WAESX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WAESX
RNWHX vs WAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WAESX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and WAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. WAESX (161M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WAESX: RNWHX (1.14) vs WAESX (0.00). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WAESX: RNWHX (11 years) vs WAESX (14 years). WAESX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. WAESX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAESX: RNWHX (250) vs WAESX (2000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.57 vs. WAESX (9.81). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 15.01 vs. WAESX (-8.51).
| RNWHX | WAESX | RNWHX / WAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.37 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.37 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.053 | 6.257 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 161M | 56,335% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.57 | 9.81 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.53 | 26.12 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.01 | -8.51 | -176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.58 | 112.51 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers