Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WAFMX
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.22
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.57
Change-$0.02 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.81M
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WAFMX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. WAFMX (31.8M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWHX (0.90) vs WAFMX (0.70). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWHX (10 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWHX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.11 vs. WAFMX (1.87). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.32 vs. WAFMX (3.53).
| RNWHX | WAFMX | RNWHX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.38 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.941 | 3.478 | 688% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.1B | 31.8M | 233,019% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.70 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.11 | 1.87 | 1,022% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.92 | 45.59 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.32 | 3.53 | 576% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.47 | 30.34 | 292% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement