Ad is loading...
RNWHX vs WAFMX
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$80.42
Change+$1.53 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.82B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.68
Change+$0.03 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.44M
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WAFMX commentary
May 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. WAFMX (36.4M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWHX (1.10) vs WAFMX (0.72). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWHX (9 years) vs WAFMX (13 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (29.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWHX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). WAFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.99 vs. RNWHX (5.01). WAFMX return over 5 years is better than : 63.11 vs. RNWHX (42.10).
| RNWHX | WAFMX | RNWHX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.38 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.788 | 6.667 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 63.8B | 36.4M | 175,275% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.72 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.01 | 11.99 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.08 | 23.56 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.10 | 63.11 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers