Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WAFMX
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$93.21
Change-$0.73 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.45B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.81
Change-$0.03 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.41M
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WAFMX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and WAFMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.4B vs. WAFMX (35.4M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWHX (0.97) vs WAFMX (0.69). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWHX (10 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWHX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.45 vs. WAFMX (2.87). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 33.76 vs. WAFMX (29.92).
| RNWHX | WAFMX | RNWHX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.38 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.612 | 11.304 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.4B | 35.4M | 210,169% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.69 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.45 | 2.87 | 468% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.51 | 58.52 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.76 | 29.92 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement