Ad is loading...
RNWHX vs WAFMX
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$76.05
Change-$1.84 (-2.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.34B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.35
Change-$0.12 (-3.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.82M
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WAFMX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 62.3B vs. WAFMX (34.8M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWHX (1.12) vs WAFMX (0.76). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWHX (9 years) vs WAFMX (13 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (29.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWHX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). WAFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.56 vs. RNWHX (-1.62). WAFMX return over 5 years is better than : 78.78 vs. RNWHX (50.02).
| RNWHX | WAFMX | RNWHX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.38 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.039 | 0.580 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 62.3B | 34.8M | 179,023% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.76 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.62 | 6.56 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.02 | -0.70 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.02 | 78.78 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers