Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WAFMX
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WAFMX
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WAFMX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a StrongBuy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. WAFMX (20.4M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs WAFMX (0.00). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWHX (11 years) vs WAFMX (15 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). WAFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWHX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.19 vs. WAFMX (-4.69). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 17.68 vs. WAFMX (-18.71).
| RNWHX | WAFMX | RNWHX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.96 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.38 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.447 | 1.667 | 987% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90B | 20.4M | 441,176% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.19 | -4.69 | -367% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.84 | 25.40 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.68 | -18.71 | -94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.44 | 42.88 | 260% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement