Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WBELX
RNWHX vs WBELX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WBELX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$95.01
Change-$0.04 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.33B
William Blair Emerging Mkts Ldrs I
Price$11.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.39M
RNWHX vs WBELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WBELX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and WBELX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. WBELX (111M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WBELX: RNWHX (0.93) vs WBELX (0.20). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WBELX: RNWHX (10 years) vs WBELX (18 years). WBELX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). WBELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBELX: RNWHX (250) vs WBELX (500000). WBELX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.97 vs. RNWHX (12.99). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 31.30 vs. WBELX (0.07).
| RNWHX | WBELX | RNWHX / WBELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.99 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.23 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.980 | 26.270 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3B | 111M | 67,838% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.20 | 458% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.99 | 16.97 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.03 | 45.90 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.30 | 0.07 | 45,273% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement