Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WBELX
RNWHX vs WBELX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WBELX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$92.77
Change+$0.17 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.99B
William Blair Emerging Mkts Ldrs I
Price$11.25
Change+$0.13 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.95M
RNWHX vs WBELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WBELX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and WBELX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 73B vs. WBELX (105M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WBELX: RNWHX (0.97) vs WBELX (0.22). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WBELX: RNWHX (10 years) vs WBELX (17 years). WBELX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). WBELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBELX: RNWHX (250) vs WBELX (500000). WBELX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.06 vs. RNWHX (16.76). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 30.81 vs. WBELX (-1.03).
| RNWHX | WBELX | RNWHX / WBELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.99 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.23 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.034 | 21.622 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73B | 105M | 69,524% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.22 | 444% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.76 | 22.06 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.42 | 31.89 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.81 | -1.03 | -2,990% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers