Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WBELX
RNWHX vs WBELX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WBELX
RNWHX vs WBELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WBELX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a StrongBuy and WBELX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. WBELX (96.9M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WBELX: RNWHX (1.17) vs WBELX (0.80). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WBELX: RNWHX (11 years) vs WBELX (18 years). WBELX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). WBELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBELX: RNWHX (250) vs WBELX (500000). WBELX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.38 vs. RNWHX (22.38). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 22.98 vs. WBELX (9.95).
| RNWHX | WBELX | RNWHX / WBELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.99 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.27 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.024 | 15.013 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 96.9M | 91,434% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.80 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.38 | 27.38 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.91 | 62.61 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.98 | 9.95 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.52 | 65.38 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers