Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WBELX
RNWHX vs WBELX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WBELX
RNWHX vs WBELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WBELX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and WBELX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. WBELX (96.6M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WBELX: RNWHX (1.14) vs WBELX (0.75). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WBELX: RNWHX (11 years) vs WBELX (18 years). WBELX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). WBELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBELX: RNWHX (250) vs WBELX (500000). WBELX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.16 vs. RNWHX (19.47). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 14.04 vs. WBELX (0.18).
| RNWHX | WBELX | RNWHX / WBELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.99 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.27 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.651 | 14.409 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 96.6M | 93,892% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.75 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.47 | 30.16 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.67 | 52.28 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.04 | 0.18 | 7,784% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.31 | 69.08 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers