Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WBELX
RNWHX vs WBELX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WBELX
RNWHX vs WBELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WBELX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and WBELX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. WBELX (102M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WBELX: RNWHX (1.15) vs WBELX (0.76). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WBELX: RNWHX (11 years) vs WBELX (18 years). WBELX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). WBELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBELX: RNWHX (250) vs WBELX (500000). WBELX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.94 vs. RNWHX (29.50). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 19.26 vs. WBELX (0.81).
| RNWHX | WBELX | RNWHX / WBELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.99 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.27 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.719 | 17.256 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.6B | 102M | 83,922% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.76 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.50 | 38.94 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.33 | 61.71 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.26 | 0.81 | 2,363% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.12 | 81.63 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement