Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WFEMX
RNWHX vs WFEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WFEMX
RNWHX vs WFEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WFEMX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and WFEMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. WFEMX (1.04B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WFEMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs WFEMX (0.00). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WFEMX: RNWHX (11 years) vs WFEMX (13 years). WFEMX (1.63) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). WFEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFEMX: RNWHX (250) vs WFEMX (1000). WFEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.08 vs. RNWHX (16.62). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.87 vs. WFEMX (15.64).
| RNWHX | WFEMX | RNWHX / WFEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.50 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.63 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.633 | 24.109 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90B | 1.04B | 8,687% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.62 | 23.08 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.86 | 94.57 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.87 | 15.64 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.27 | 139.65 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers