Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WIFMX
RNWHX vs WIFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WIFMX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.13
Change+$0.12 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.07B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs Instl
Price$3.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.42M
RNWHX vs WIFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WIFMX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and WIFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. WIFMX (37.4M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WIFMX: RNWHX (0.99) vs WIFMX (0.85). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WIFMX: RNWHX (10 years) vs WIFMX (9 years). WIFMX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WIFMX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WIFMX: RNWHX (250) vs WIFMX (100000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.61 vs. WIFMX (9.01). WIFMX return over 5 years is better than : 36.91 vs. RNWHX (28.90).
| RNWHX | WIFMX | RNWHX / WIFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.00 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.56 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.930 | 10.795 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.1B | 37.4M | 187,433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.85 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.61 | 9.01 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.84 | 59.32 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.90 | 36.91 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement