Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WIFMX
RNWHX vs WIFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WIFMX
RNWHX vs WIFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WIFMX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and WIFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. WIFMX (23.1M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WIFMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs WIFMX (0.00). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WIFMX: RNWHX (11 years) vs WIFMX (10 years). WIFMX (2.53) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). WIFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WIFMX: RNWHX (250) vs WIFMX (100000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.50 vs. WIFMX (-3.12). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 19.26 vs. WIFMX (-8.27).
| RNWHX | WIFMX | RNWHX / WIFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.76 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.53 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.719 | 1.359 | 1,231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.6B | 23.1M | 370,563% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.50 | -3.12 | -947% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.33 | 30.68 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.26 | -8.27 | -233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.12 | 41.70 | 290% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement