Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs ZEMAX
RNWHX vs ZEMAX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs ZEMAX
RNWHX vs ZEMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. ZEMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and ZEMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. ZEMAX (332M). ZEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: ZEMAX (1.39) vs RNWHX (1.14). RNWHX was incepted earlier than ZEMAX: RNWHX (11 years) vs ZEMAX (8 years). ZEMAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). ZEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs ZEMAX (100000). ZEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.79 vs. RNWHX (19.47). ZEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.16 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| RNWHX | ZEMAX | RNWHX / ZEMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.93 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.33 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.651 | 27.489 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 332M | 27,319% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.39 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.47 | 30.79 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.67 | 72.65 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.04 | 26.16 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement