Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs ZEMIX
RNWHX vs ZEMIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs ZEMIX
RNWHX vs ZEMIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. ZEMIX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and ZEMIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. ZEMIX (343M). ZEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: ZEMIX (1.46) vs RNWHX (1.15). RNWHX was incepted earlier than ZEMIX: RNWHX (11 years) vs ZEMIX (8 years). ZEMIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). ZEMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZEMIX: RNWHX (250) vs ZEMIX (250000). ZEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.77 vs. RNWHX (29.50). ZEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 28.69 vs. RNWHX (19.26).
| RNWHX | ZEMIX | RNWHX / ZEMIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.86 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.12 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.719 | 32.824 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.6B | 343M | 24,956% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.46 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.50 | 43.77 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.33 | 89.99 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.26 | 28.69 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement