ROKT
Price
$108.49
Change
-$1.48 (-1.35%)
Updated
Sep 1 closing price
Net Assets
193.73M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SHLD
Price
$64.11
Change
-$1.37 (-2.09%)
Updated
Sep 1 closing price
Net Assets
7.24B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ROKT vs SHLD

ROKT vs SHLD Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) vs. Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD)

Key Takeaways

  • ROKT and SHLD both target frontier and defense-related themes but differ in scope: ROKT emphasizes broad final frontiers including space and deep-sea exploration, while SHLD focuses narrowly on defense technology companies.
  • ROKT tracks the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index with approximately 37 holdings and a 0.45% expense ratio; SHLD tracks the Global X Defense Tech Index with 50 holdings and a 0.50% expense ratio.
  • Sector allocations overlap significantly in aerospace and defense, yet ROKT includes greater exposure to energy and specialized industrials, while SHLD maintains a more concentrated industrials tilt at roughly 89%.
  • Both ETFs employ passive, rules-based indexing strategies with periodic rebalancing, offering investors pure thematic exposure without leverage or active management overlays.
  • Structural differences in diversification and liquidity profiles position ROKT as a smaller, more specialized vehicle and SHLD as a larger fund with broader defense-tech concentration.
  • Relative positioning reflects complementary rather than direct competition, with each ETF appealing to investors seeking distinct entry points into evolving technology and security sectors.

Introduction

ROKT and SHLD represent distinct approaches to thematic equity investing within overlapping areas of advanced technology and national security. ROKT provides exposure to companies advancing frontier technologies such as space exploration and deep-sea operations. SHLD concentrates on firms developing and deploying defense technologies. The two exchange-traded funds do not compete head-to-head; instead, they offer investors alternative pathways to capture growth in high-tech industrials amid sustained capital spending on innovation and security. This comparison highlights structural, exposure, and positioning differences that matter for portfolio construction.

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) Overview

The State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) seeks to track the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. The fund holds approximately 37 securities and maintains a 0.45% expense ratio. Top holdings typically include companies such as Oceaneering International, Forum Energy Technologies, and RTX Corporation. Sector allocations feature significant weight in aerospace and defense, with additional exposure to industrials and energy. ROKT follows a passive, market-cap-adjusted indexing approach with quarterly rebalancing. Its thematic focus on final frontiers distinguishes it as a specialized vehicle for investors targeting early-stage technological frontiers rather than broad market exposure.

Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) Overview

The Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) seeks to track the Global X Defense Tech Index. The fund holds 50 securities and carries a 0.50% expense ratio. Top holdings commonly feature RTX Corporation, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Palantir Technologies. Sector allocations concentrate heavily in industrials at approximately 89%, with the balance in information technology. SHLD employs a passive, modified market-capitalization weighting methodology with periodic rebalancing. Its explicit defense-technology mandate provides targeted exposure to companies benefiting from global security spending and technological advancement in military applications.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the broader aerospace, defense, and advanced technology sectors, where sustained government and commercial investment supports long-term growth. Macroeconomic drivers include elevated defense budgets in response to geopolitical tensions, accelerating adoption of autonomous systems, and continued expansion of space and underwater exploration programs. Regulatory developments around export controls and technology transfer continue to shape competitive dynamics. Capital flows into defense and frontier technology remain resilient across recent market cycles, though sector participants face risks from supply-chain constraints, valuation compression during periods of higher interest rates, and potential shifts in fiscal priorities. These factors create an environment where thematic selectivity remains important for investors evaluating relative positioning.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both ETFs have reflected broader sector rotation toward defense and technology names amid ongoing earnings cycles and macroeconomic shifts. ROKT’s broader frontier mandate has produced exposure to energy and exploration sub-sectors that can exhibit different volatility patterns compared with pure defense plays. SHLD’s concentrated defense-tech holdings have aligned more closely with traditional aerospace contractors and cybersecurity firms during periods of heightened security spending. Relative volatility differences arise from SHLD’s higher concentration in a smaller number of large-cap defense names versus ROKT’s more diversified frontier basket. Investors monitoring interest-rate expectations and commodity trends can observe how each fund’s sector weights influence sensitivity to these macro variables over time.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into thematic ETFs like ROKT and SHLD may find the platform’s analytical capabilities useful for refining screening criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including expense efficiency, diversification profile, and thematic alignment with current sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to SHLD. The fund’s larger scale, concentrated defense-tech exposure, and alignment with sustained global security spending provide a clearer momentum tailwind within the observed parameters, though both ETFs remain viable depending on an investor’s specific risk tolerance and thematic objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ROKT vs. SHLD commentary
Sep 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ROKT is a Hold and SHLD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHLD has more net assets: 7.24B vs. ROKT (194M). ROKT has a higher annual dividend yield than SHLD: ROKT (27.634) vs SHLD (-0.732). ROKT was incepted earlier than SHLD: ROKT (8 years) vs SHLD (3 years). ROKT (0.45) has a lower expense ratio than SHLD (0.50). SHLD has a higher turnover ROKT (21.00) vs ROKT (21.00).
ROKTSHLDROKT / SHLD
Gain YTD27.634-0.732-3,774%
Net Assets194M7.24B3%
Total Expense Ratio0.450.5090%
Turnover21.0032.7964%
Yield0.280.6544%
Fund Existence8 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ROKTSHLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%