ROKT
Price
$121.28
Change
-$0.44 (-0.36%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:11 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
210.88M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SHLD
Price
$69.91
Change
-$0.24 (-0.34%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:26 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
7.66B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ROKT vs SHLD

ROKT vs SHLD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) vs. Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD)

Key Takeaways

  • State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) provides exposure to frontier technologies including space exploration and deep-sea applications, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) targets companies benefiting from defense technology adoption and utilization.
  • ROKT maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.45% compared to SHLD’s 0.50%, offering a modest cost advantage for long-term holders.
  • Both ETFs exhibit concentrated thematic exposure with heavy allocations to the industrials sector, though SHLD shows greater concentration in traditional defense contractors and ROKT incorporates broader frontier technology holdings.
  • ROKT typically holds 33–39 securities tracking the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, whereas SHLD holds a comparable number of positions aligned with the Global X Defense Tech Index.
  • Structural differences position ROKT for investors seeking diversified frontier innovation exposure and SHLD for those focused on defense spending trends and technology integration in security applications.
  • Both funds employ passive indexing strategies with periodic rebalancing, resulting in similar liquidity profiles suited to thematic allocation rather than high-frequency trading.

Introduction

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) represent distinct yet overlapping thematic strategies within the broader technology and industrials landscape. They do not compete directly as substitutes but instead offer investors alternative pathways to capture growth in advanced technology sectors. ROKT emphasizes exploratory and frontier applications, while SHLD concentrates on defense-specific innovations and procurement cycles. This comparison helps investors evaluate structural characteristics, cost efficiency, and thematic fit amid ongoing developments in aerospace, security, and emerging technologies.

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) Overview

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) is a passive, rules-based exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index before fees and expenses. The index targets companies involved in space exploration, deep-sea exploration, and related frontier technologies. The fund typically holds between 33 and 39 securities. Top holdings often include companies such as RTX Corp (RTX), Northrop Grumman Corp (NOC), and Oceaneering International Inc, with the top 10 positions representing a meaningful portion of assets. Sector allocation is dominated by industrials, generally exceeding 70%, followed by information technology and energy. The expense ratio stands at 0.45%. ROKT employs a tier-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing to maintain alignment with the index. As a thematic equity ETF, it provides targeted exposure without leverage or inverse features.

Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) Overview

Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) is a passive exchange-traded fund designed to track the Global X Defense Tech Index before fees and expenses. The strategy focuses on companies positioned to benefit from increased adoption of defense technology, including traditional contractors and technology providers in cybersecurity and intelligence. The fund holds approximately 40 securities. Prominent top holdings frequently feature RTX Corp (RTX), General Dynamics Corp (GD), Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT), Northrop Grumman Corp (NOC), and Palantir Technologies Inc (PLTR). Sector breakdown shows heavy concentration in industrials, often near 89%, with the balance in information technology. The expense ratio is 0.50%. SHLD uses a modified market-capitalization or equal-weighted approach with regular rebalancing. It operates as a non-diversified thematic equity ETF without leverage.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the industrials and technology sectors, influenced by sustained global defense spending, advancements in aerospace capabilities, and innovation in emerging domains such as space and cybersecurity. Capital flows into defense and frontier technology have been supported by geopolitical developments and government procurement priorities. Regulatory environments continue to emphasize supply-chain resilience and technological superiority. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations and fiscal budgets affect capital allocation within these themes. Sector risks include policy shifts, supply-chain disruptions, and valuation sensitivity to earnings growth in key holdings.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have demonstrated sensitivity to sector rotation favoring industrials and defense-related equities. ROKT’s broader frontier exposure may provide differentiation during periods of heightened interest in space and exploration initiatives, while SHLD’s focus on established defense contractors can offer relative stability amid consistent procurement trends. Volatility differences arise from holdings concentration and thematic emphasis, with both funds exhibiting characteristics typical of specialized sector ETFs rather than broad-market vehicles. Relative positioning reflects investor preferences for either diversified innovation themes or defense-centric technology integration.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) due to its lower expense ratio, slightly broader thematic diversification across frontier technologies, and comparable holdings profile. SHLD offers compelling concentration in defense momentum but carries a higher cost structure. Final allocation decisions should reflect individual risk tolerance and portfolio objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ROKT vs. SHLD commentary
Aug 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ROKT is a StrongBuy and SHLD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHLD has more net assets: 7.66B vs. ROKT (211M). ROKT has a higher annual dividend yield than SHLD: ROKT (43.194) vs SHLD (8.620). ROKT was incepted earlier than SHLD: ROKT (8 years) vs SHLD (3 years). ROKT (0.45) has a lower expense ratio than SHLD (0.50). SHLD has a higher turnover ROKT (21.00) vs ROKT (21.00).
ROKTSHLDROKT / SHLD
Gain YTD43.1948.620501%
Net Assets211M7.66B3%
Total Expense Ratio0.450.5090%
Turnover21.0032.7964%
Yield0.280.6742%
Fund Existence8 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ROKTSHLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ROKT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KEAT34.040.09
+0.27%
Keating Active ETF
FNCL82.460.18
+0.22%
Fidelity MSCI Financials ETF
USDU26.450.01
+0.04%
WisdomTree Bloomberg US Dllr Bullish ETF
OILD32.48-0.02
-0.06%
MicroSectorsTM Ol&Gs E&P -3X Inv Lg ETNs
TTOP14.90-0.01
-0.09%
21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 Index ETF

ROKT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROKT has been closely correlated with PL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ROKT jumps, then PL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROKT
1D Price
Change %
ROKT100%
+0.97%
PL - ROKT
67%
Closely correlated
+3.38%
BWXT - ROKT
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
TDY - ROKT
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
DCO - ROKT
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
HII - ROKT
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
More

SHLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHLD has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHLD jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHLD
1D Price
Change %
SHLD100%
+1.01%
LHX - SHLD
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
NOC - SHLD
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
GD - SHLD
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
BWXT - SHLD
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
LMT - SHLD
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
More