Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs SBFAX
RPFGX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs SBFAX
1919 Financial Services A
Price$29.32
Change+$0.07 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.18M
RPFGX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. SBFAX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Hold and SBFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. SBFAX (110M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: RPFGX (1.26) vs SBFAX (0.66). RPFGX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: RPFGX (35 years) vs SBFAX (27 years). SBFAX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). SBFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). SBFAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RPFGX (5%) vs RPFGX (5%). RPFGX (1000) and SBFAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. SBFAX (-14.19). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 88.11 vs. SBFAX (12.89).
| RPFGX | SBFAX | RPFGX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.193 | 1.069 | 2,077% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 110M | 1,055% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.66 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | -14.19 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.41 | -0.30 | -20,789% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.11 | 12.89 | 683% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.01 | 42.26 | 256% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement