Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs SBFAX
RPFGX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs SBFAX
1919 Financial Services A
Price$29.43
Change+$0.39 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.15M
RPFGX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. SBFAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Buy and SBFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. SBFAX (119M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: RPFGX (1.43) vs SBFAX (0.66). RPFGX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: RPFGX (34 years) vs SBFAX (27 years). SBFAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). SBFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). SBFAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RPFGX (5%) vs RPFGX (5%). RPFGX (1000) and SBFAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.89 vs. SBFAX (10.37). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 83.92 vs. SBFAX (25.05).
| RPFGX | SBFAX | RPFGX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.36 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.36 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.507 | 0.103 | 9,193% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 119M | 886% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.66 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.89 | 10.37 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.35 | -1.38 | -3,205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.92 | 25.05 | 335% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.64 | 53.17 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers