Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs SBFAX
RPFGX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs SBFAX
RPFGX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. SBFAX commentary
Aug 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Hold and SBFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. SBFAX (100M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: RPFGX (1.28) vs SBFAX (0.07). RPFGX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: RPFGX (35 years) vs SBFAX (28 years). SBFAX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RPFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. SBFAX (9.00). SBFAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RPFGX (5%) vs RPFGX (5%). RPFGX (1000) and SBFAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.03 vs. SBFAX (-4.86). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 60.53 vs. SBFAX (-11.11).
| RPFGX | SBFAX | RPFGX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.414 | 5.862 | 58% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 100M | 1,191% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.07 | 1,834% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.03 | -4.86 | -289% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.86 | 7.07 | 946% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.53 | -11.11 | -545% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.79 | 50.63 | 262% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers