Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs SBFAX
RPFGX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs SBFAX
RPFGX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. SBFAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Hold and SBFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. SBFAX (95.6M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: RPFGX (1.23) vs SBFAX (0.07). RPFGX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: RPFGX (35 years) vs SBFAX (28 years). SBFAX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RPFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. SBFAX (9.00). SBFAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RPFGX (5%) vs RPFGX (5%). RPFGX (1000) and SBFAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.92 vs. SBFAX (-9.74). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 61.31 vs. SBFAX (-12.92).
| RPFGX | SBFAX | RPFGX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.296 | 4.349 | 99% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 95.6M | 1,236% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.07 | 1,839% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.92 | -9.74 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.21 | 9.91 | 769% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.31 | -12.92 | -474% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.46 | 43.44 | 296% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement