Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs SFSLX
RPFGX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs SFSLX
1919 Financial Services C
Price$24.87
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.59M
RPFGX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. SFSLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Hold and SFSLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. SFSLX (108M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: RPFGX (1.30) vs SFSLX (0.00). RPFGX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: RPFGX (35 years) vs SFSLX (27 years). SFSLX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). SFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX (1000) and SFSLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.37 vs. SFSLX (-15.83). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 89.59 vs. SFSLX (6.13).
| RPFGX | SFSLX | RPFGX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.19 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.19 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.917 | -2.893 | -619% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 108M | 1,036% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.37 | -15.83 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.08 | -6.45 | -931% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.59 | 6.13 | 1,462% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.51 | 25.26 | 402% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement