Ad is loading...
RPFGX vs SFSLX
RPFGX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs SFSLX
1919 Financial Services C
Price$24.13
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.83M
RPFGX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. SFSLX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Hold and SFSLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 933M vs. SFSLX (114M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: RPFGX (1.48) vs SFSLX (0.00). RPFGX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: RPFGX (34 years) vs SFSLX (26 years). SFSLX (2.08) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.95). SFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX (1000) and SFSLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.39 vs. SFSLX (7.21). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 94.86 vs. SFSLX (33.88).
| RPFGX | SFSLX | RPFGX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 2.08 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 2.08 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.680 | -5.825 | 63% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 933M | 114M | 818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.39 | 7.21 | 241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.85 | -12.36 | -185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.86 | 33.88 | 280% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.23 | 32.64 | 212% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...