Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs SFSLX
RPFGX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs SFSLX
1919 Financial Services C
Price$25.48
Change+$0.29 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.15M
RPFGX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. SFSLX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Buy and SFSLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. SFSLX (111M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: RPFGX (1.29) vs SFSLX (0.00). RPFGX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: RPFGX (35 years) vs SFSLX (27 years). SFSLX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). SFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX (1000) and SFSLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.50 vs. SFSLX (-10.55). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 108.71 vs. SFSLX (22.55).
| RPFGX | SFSLX | RPFGX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.19 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.19 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.959 | -1.525 | -1,047% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 111M | 1,023% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.50 | -10.55 | -137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.68 | 0.31 | 23,094% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.71 | 22.55 | 482% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.94 | 30.22 | 334% |