Ad is loading...
RPFGX vs SFSLX
RPFGX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs SFSLX
1919 Financial Services C
Price$25.38
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.25M
RPFGX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. SFSLX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Buy and SFSLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. SFSLX (119M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: RPFGX (1.51) vs SFSLX (0.00). RPFGX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: RPFGX (34 years) vs SFSLX (27 years). SFSLX (2.08) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.95). SFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX (1000) and SFSLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.55 vs. SFSLX (6.19). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 113.39 vs. SFSLX (36.38).
| RPFGX | SFSLX | RPFGX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 2.08 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 2.08 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.043 | -0.782 | -645% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 119M | 859% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.55 | 6.19 | 300% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.69 | -0.27 | -16,991% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.39 | 36.38 | 312% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.75 | 39.59 | 207% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers