Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs SFSLX
RPFGX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs SFSLX
1919 Financial Services C
Price$27.00
Change+$0.27 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.4M
RPFGX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. SFSLX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Buy and SFSLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. SFSLX (123M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: RPFGX (1.35) vs SFSLX (0.00). RPFGX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: RPFGX (34 years) vs SFSLX (27 years). SFSLX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). SFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX (1000) and SFSLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.09 vs. SFSLX (11.93). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 125.88 vs. SFSLX (40.05).
| RPFGX | SFSLX | RPFGX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.19 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.19 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.116 | 4.496 | 358% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 123M | 915% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.09 | 11.93 | 261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.82 | 6.99 | 984% |
| Returns for 5 years | 125.88 | 40.05 | 314% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.24 | 42.12 | 233% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement