Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPMGX vs SUFCX
RPMGX vs SUFCX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs SUFCX
RPMGX vs SUFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. SUFCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and SUFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. SUFCX (71.5M). RPMGX (0.00) and SUFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than SUFCX: RPMGX (34 years) vs SUFCX (28 years). SUFCX (2.27) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.77). SUFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RPMGX (31.50). RPMGX (2500) and SUFCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SUFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.01 vs. RPMGX (-6.56). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : -24.68 vs. SUFCX (-54.66).
| RPMGX | SUFCX | RPMGX / SUFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.27 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.27 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.051 | 9.202 | -1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.1B | 71.5M | 29,510% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.56 | 5.01 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.58 | 29.85 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.68 | -54.66 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.29 | -50.75 | -56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement