Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPMGX vs WFDSX
RPMGX vs WFDSX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs WFDSX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.28
Change+$0.19 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl Inst
Price$33.29
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets954.73M
RPMGX vs WFDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. WFDSX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and WFDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. WFDSX (955M). RPMGX (0.00) and WFDSX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than WFDSX: RPMGX (33 years) vs WFDSX (19 years). WFDSX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). WFDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDSX: RPMGX (2500) vs WFDSX (1000000). WFDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. RPMGX (-5.59). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 1.46 vs. WFDSX (-21.99).
| RPMGX | WFDSX | RPMGX / WFDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.89 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.92 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.366 | 7.157 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27B | 955M | 2,827% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.59 | 2.81 | -199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.97 | 32.27 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.46 | -21.99 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.86 | -3.32 | -870% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement