Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RRMGX vs SMFAX
RRMGX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts RRMGX vs SMFAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$87.66
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.05B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr A
Price$32.82
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets712.92M
RRMGX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRMGX vs. SMFAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRMGX is a Hold and SMFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 25B vs. SMFAX (713M). RRMGX (0.00) and SMFAX (0.00) have matching dividends . RRMGX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: RRMGX (23 years) vs SMFAX (14 years). SMFAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.29). SMFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). RRMGX (2500) and SMFAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. RRMGX (-10.65). SMFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.73 vs. RRMGX (-15.04).
| RRMGX | SMFAX | RRMGX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.21 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.39 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.296 | 8.856 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25B | 713M | 3,506% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.65 | 2.79 | -382% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.72 | 38.83 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.04 | 15.73 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.67 | 93.72 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement