Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RRMGX vs SMFAX
RRMGX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts RRMGX vs SMFAX
RRMGX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRMGX vs. SMFAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRMGX is a Hold and SMFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. SMFAX (774M). RRMGX (0.00) and SMFAX (0.00) have matching dividends . RRMGX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: RRMGX (24 years) vs SMFAX (15 years). SMFAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.31). SMFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RRMGX (31.50). RRMGX (2500) and SMFAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.87 vs. SMFAX (-19.77). SMFAX return over 5 years is better than : -19.56 vs. RRMGX (-29.10).
| RRMGX | SMFAX | RRMGX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.20 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.38 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.426 | 8.890 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.1B | 774M | 2,726% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.87 | -19.77 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.46 | 8.38 | -65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.10 | -19.56 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.81 | 68.66 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement