Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RRMGX vs SMFAX
RRMGX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts RRMGX vs SMFAX
RRMGX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRMGX vs. SMFAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRMGX is a Hold and SMFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 22.5B vs. SMFAX (746M). RRMGX (0.00) and SMFAX (0.00) have matching dividends . RRMGX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: RRMGX (24 years) vs SMFAX (14 years). SMFAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.31). SMFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RRMGX (31.50). RRMGX (2500) and SMFAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.44 vs. SMFAX (-13.66). SMFAX return over 5 years is better than : -16.43 vs. RRMGX (-24.49).
| RRMGX | SMFAX | RRMGX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.20 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.38 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.692 | 8.890 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.5B | 746M | 3,016% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.44 | -13.66 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.81 | 9.67 | -19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.49 | -16.43 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.82 | 81.26 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement