Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RRMGX vs SMFCX
RRMGX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts RRMGX vs SMFCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$87.68
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.05B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$28.74
Change+$0.15 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets713.82M
RRMGX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRMGX vs. SMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRMGX is a Hold and SMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 25B vs. SMFCX (714M). RRMGX (0.00) and SMFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RRMGX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: RRMGX (23 years) vs SMFCX (14 years). SMFCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.29). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). SMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: SMFCX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). SMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.95 vs. RRMGX (-10.63). SMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.61 vs. RRMGX (-14.91).
| RRMGX | SMFCX | RRMGX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.95 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.96 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.296 | 8.699 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25B | 714M | 3,501% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.63 | 0.95 | -1,121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.72 | 35.06 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.91 | 9.61 | -155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.67 | 74.65 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement