Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RRMGX vs SMFCX
RRMGX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts RRMGX vs SMFCX
RRMGX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRMGX vs. SMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRMGX is a Hold and SMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. SMFCX (763M). RRMGX (0.00) and SMFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RRMGX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: RRMGX (24 years) vs SMFCX (14 years). SMFCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.31). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RRMGX (31.50). SMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: SMFCX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.82 vs. SMFCX (-18.33). SMFCX (-23.04) and RRMGX (-23.05) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RRMGX | SMFCX | RRMGX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.94 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.98 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.490 | 10.994 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 763M | 2,962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.82 | -18.33 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.70 | -1.53 | 308% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.05 | -23.04 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.13 | 49.11 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement