Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RRMGX vs WFDSX
RRMGX vs WFDSX Comparison
Open Charts RRMGX vs WFDSX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$90.02
Change-$1.33 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.11B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl Inst
Price$33.14
Change-$0.46 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets959.55M
RRMGX vs WFDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRMGX vs. WFDSX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRMGX is a Hold and WFDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. WFDSX (960M). RRMGX (0.00) and WFDSX (0.00) have matching dividends . RRMGX was incepted earlier than WFDSX: RRMGX (23 years) vs WFDSX (19 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than WFDSX (0.92). WFDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). RRMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDSX: RRMGX (2500) vs WFDSX (1000000). WFDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.05 vs. RRMGX (-5.36). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : -1.87 vs. WFDSX (-20.47).
| RRMGX | WFDSX | RRMGX / WFDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.89 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.92 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.389 | 6.834 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.1B | 960M | 2,823% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.36 | 4.05 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.36 | 27.90 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.87 | -20.47 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.80 | -4.22 | -422% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement