Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSEAX vs RWMFX
RSEAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RSEAX vs RWMFX
RSEAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSEAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSEAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RSEAX (3.05B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RSEAX: RWMFX (1.40) vs RSEAX (0.44). RSEAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RSEAX (14 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RSEAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RSEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RSEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: RSEAX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RSEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.50 vs. RWMFX (7.03). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. RSEAX (9.14).
| RSEAX | RWMFX | RSEAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.31 | 348% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.31 | 381% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.517 | 1.322 | 644% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.05B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.40 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.50 | 7.03 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.79 | 30.20 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.14 | 26.38 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.04 | 82.33 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement