Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSEAX vs RWMFX
RSEAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RSEAX vs RWMFX
RSEAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSEAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSEAX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. RSEAX (3.12B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RSEAX: RWMFX (1.40) vs RSEAX (0.44). RSEAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RSEAX (14 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RSEAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RSEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RSEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: RSEAX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RSEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.71 vs. RWMFX (8.10). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. RSEAX (12.64).
| RSEAX | RWMFX | RSEAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.31 | 348% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.31 | 381% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.887 | 5.575 | 177% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.12B | 214B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.40 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.71 | 8.10 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.19 | 33.11 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.64 | 26.71 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.40 | 85.42 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement