Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSECX vs RWMFX
RSECX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RSECX vs RWMFX
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity C
Price$17.83
Change+$0.10 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.29B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.42 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.25B
RSECX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSECX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSECX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. RSECX (3.29B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RSECX: RWMFX (1.43) vs RSECX (0.04). RSECX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RSECX (13 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). RSECX (1.95) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RSECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RSECX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: RSECX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.69 vs. RSECX (2.16). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 57.64 vs. RSECX (40.10).
| RSECX | RWMFX | RSECX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.31 | 597% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.31 | 629% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.229 | 9.760 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.29B | 207B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.43 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.16 | 5.69 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.58 | 46.35 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.10 | 57.64 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.93 | 93.97 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement