Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSECX vs RWMFX
RSECX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RSECX vs RWMFX
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity C
Price$17.65
Change+$0.05 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.21B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.25
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
RSECX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSECX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSECX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. RSECX (3.21B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RSECX: RWMFX (1.41) vs RSECX (0.04). RSECX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RSECX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RSECX (1.95) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RSECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RSECX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: RSECX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. RSECX (-2.12). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.02 vs. RSECX (25.31).
| RSECX | RWMFX | RSECX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.31 | 597% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.31 | 629% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.106 | 8.905 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.21B | 204B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.41 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.12 | 4.59 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.17 | 29.92 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.31 | 45.02 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.62 | 72.75 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers