Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSECX vs RWMFX
RSECX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RSECX vs RWMFX
RSECX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSECX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSECX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RSECX (3.05B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RSECX: RWMFX (1.40) vs RSECX (0.08). RSECX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RSECX (14 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RSECX (1.93) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RSECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RSECX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: RSECX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RSECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. RWMFX (7.03). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. RSECX (5.07).
| RSECX | RWMFX | RSECX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.31 | 590% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.31 | 623% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.155 | 1.322 | 617% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.05B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 1.40 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.32 | 7.03 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.16 | 30.20 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.07 | 26.38 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.67 | 82.33 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement